|
Instructional Development Award RecipientsSeveral undergraduate instructors who attended the 2004 SPACE workshops were awarded funds to continue their efforts in integrating spatial analysis into their course curriculums. These pages showcase their achievements. See the full recipient list. David PadgettAffiliation: Associate Professor of Geography, Tennessee State University Notable Achievements in His Own Words My objective is not to create GIS experts in one semester, but instead to expose the students to dynamic spatial approaches to interdisciplinary urban problems. My primary challenge is conveying spatial concepts to students who have little to no geography background. Tennessee State University (TSU) does not offer a degree in Geography. Thus, all of the upper-division courses are general electives. I get students from nearly every department and program on campus. My strategy to date has been to focus upon the inter-disciplinary nature of geography in order to convince them that regardless of their primary course of study, there's "something for everybody." The main vehicle for allowing students to apply spatial techniques to their own disciplinary specialties is the "Urban GIS Assignment". Examples of student projects are: "Impacts of an Interstate Highway upon an Inner-City Community" (Sociology Major), and "An Assessment of Achievement Among Three Local Schools in Terms of Race and Income" (Education Major). With the relative success of the term paper assignment, I have had some difficulty finding a GIS-based supplementary textbook. The main required texts are Land Use and Society by Rutherford H. Platt, and Sprawl City, by Robert D. Bullard. They are excellent for teaching the fundamentals of urban planning and contemporary urban problem-solving, respectively. For the past three years I have used two ESRI Press textbooks, Community Geography and Beyond Maps as supplementary materials to demonstrate "real world" applications of GIS and spatial analysis. Both books are very useful for seasoned geographers and GIS users, but I have not found them to be "classroom friendly" for novices. Not to mention the fact that the added cost of a third required text is a major turn-off for students enrolled in an elective course. My solution to this problem is to use the students' term paper data to develop in-class demonstration modules using ArcGIS, GeoDa, and Flow Mapper. Doing so will allow me to work around the steep learning curve faced by students new to GIS. My objective is not to create GIS experts in one semester, but instead to expose the students to dynamic spatial approaches to interdisciplinary urban problems. I will demonstrate the application of Flow Mapper for the class in step-by-step fashion. The final maps and data will be saved and given to the students in digital format. More ambitious and computer-savvy students will be encouraged to attempt to apply Flow Mapper to their data independently. Future ParticipationThe award was used to support my presentation at the 2005 ESRI Education User Conference in San Diego, July 2005:
I concluded that students exposed to the modules were able to successfully apply GIS and spatial analysis tools to urban problems and engage in critical thinking about them. However, the development of the modules was more time-consuming than expected. I'm happy to report that beginning in the fall of 2005, the course will be taught in a PC lab setting for the first time, allowing for students to have more hands-on experiences. I will continue to utilize the modules because the students will still benefit from visual demonstrations of various spatially-based urban analyses. Back to “Instructional Development Award Recipients”
|